Within the broader certificate authority market, organizations must make a critical architectural decision between using a public Certificate Authority or establishing their own private Certificate Authority. The choice depends entirely on the use case and who or what needs to trust the issued certificates. A public CA is a third-party entity, like DigiCert, Sectigo, or GlobalSign, whose root certificates are embedded in the trusted root stores of all major operating systems, web browsers, and mobile devices. This means that certificates issued by a public CA are automatically and universally trusted by any device on the public internet. This makes public CAs the mandatory choice for any public-facing service, such as a company's main website, e-commerce platform, or customer portal. Using a publicly trusted certificate ensures that any visitor or customer can connect securely without encountering frightening browser errors that would destroy trust and drive them away.

A private Certificate Authority, on the other hand, is a CA that an organization sets up and manages for its own internal use. The root certificate of a private CA is not included in public trust stores; instead, it must be manually distributed and installed on all devices that need to trust the certificates it issues. This makes private CAs unsuitable for public services but ideal for securing internal, closed-loop ecosystems. Common use cases include securing internal corporate applications and intranet sites, authenticating users and devices to a corporate Wi-Fi or VPN network, enabling secure machine-to-machine (M2M) communication within a factory, or issuing unique identities to a fleet of company-owned IoT devices. By operating a private CA, an organization gains complete control over the certificate issuance process, policies, and validation procedures, allowing for greater flexibility and customization than a public CA can offer for internal-facing systems.

The decision to deploy a private CA brings both benefits and significant responsibilities. The primary benefits are cost and control. Instead of paying a public CA for every certificate, an organization can issue an unlimited number of certificates from its private CA at no per-certificate cost, which can be highly economical for large-scale deployments like IoT. It also allows for custom certificate profiles and shorter validity periods tailored to specific internal security requirements. However, the responsibility of securely operating a PKI is substantial. The organization must protect the private key of its root CA with the highest level of security, typically using a hardware security module (HSM). The certificate authority market size is projected to grow USD 16.58 Billion by 2035, exhibiting a CAGR of 13.63% during the forecast period 2025-2035. This growth includes the managed PKI services that public CAs offer to help enterprises deploy and manage private CAs without taking on the full operational burden.

Ultimately, many large enterprises adopt a hybrid approach, leveraging both public and private CAs as part of a comprehensive identity and access management strategy. They use publicly trusted certificates for all external-facing systems to ensure seamless public access and maintain brand trust. Simultaneously, they deploy a private CA (or multiple private CAs) to secure their internal infrastructure, providing strong authentication and encryption for users, devices, and applications behind the corporate firewall. Leading public Certificate Authorities often facilitate this hybrid model by offering managed private CA services, which combine the control and flexibility of a private CA with the security expertise and robust infrastructure of a trusted public provider. This allows enterprises to get the best of both worlds, applying the appropriate trust model for each specific use case across their diverse IT environment.

Explore More Like This in Our Regional Reports:

Japan Application Gateway Market

South Korea Application Gateway Market

Spain Application Gateway Market